Doctor-patient differences in risk preferences, and their links to decision-making: a field experiment
نویسندگان
چکیده
We conduct a field experiment among patients and doctors, with the aim to test i) whether the two groups have similar risk preferences; and ii) whether differences in risk preferences between doctors and patients are associated with the likelihood of patients seeking a second medical opinion. We measure risk preferences using an adaptation of the Holt and Laury (2002) test to the healthcare context (Galizzi et al., 2013). We find no evidence that the two groups of doctors and patients systematically differ in their preferences towards risk. We find, however, robust evidence that differences between doctors’ and patients’ risk preferences associate with patients’ decision to look for a second opinion: the more diverse preferences are, the more likely patients are to seek a second opinion.
منابع مشابه
Refusal of treatment by mentally competent patient: the choice of doctor-patient relationship models.
INTRODUCTION In modern medicine professional relationship between the clinician and the patient is patient-centered. Patients become actively involved in the treatment decision making process and are encouraged to express their health-related preferences. Some patients may, however, refuse a favorable risk/benefit ratio treatment. This manuscript presents three cases of refusal of treatment by ...
متن کاملInvolving patients in primary care consultations: assessing preferences using discrete choice experiments.
BACKGROUND Shared decision making (SDM) involves patients and doctors contributing as partners to treatment decisions. It is not known whether or to what extent SDM contributes to the welfare arising from a consultation, and how important this contribution is relative to other attributes of a consultation. AIM To identify patient preferences for SDM relative to other utility bearing attribute...
متن کاملRole Taking Under Financial Risk Decision Making
This paper explores people’s behavior when they are facing financial risks. Through the setting of an economics experiment, people’s willingness to bear financial risks and their tendency to impose risks on others are investigated. The experiment result shows that most people are risk-neutral or risk-averse when making decision under financial environment, and their tendency to impose risks on ...
متن کاملEvaluation of Preferences in Receiving Facilities Using Discrete Choice Experiment Technique
The present study evaluates the effect of some of the most important variables affecting the preferences of bank loan applicants, based on the discrete choice test method. Initially, the variables and their levels were identified after consultation with banking experts and the required information was collected through a questionnaire. The results show that any increase in interest rates, inten...
متن کاملA fuzzy group decision making approach to construction project risk management
Implementation of the risk management concepts into construction practice may enhance the performance of project by taking appropriate response actions against identified risks. This research proposes a multi-criteria group decision making approach for the evaluation of different alternative response scenarios. To take into account the uncertainties inherent in evaluation process, fuzzy logic i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013